warandpeace: (Tнιѕ αιɴ'т rocĸ'ɴ'roll Tнιѕ ιѕ ɢeɴocιde!)
McDonell Benedict "Kazuhira (和平)" Miller ([personal profile] warandpeace) wrote in [community profile] thisavrou2016-03-22 11:13 pm

(no subject)

☄ Audio
Maybe it's that I'm a perfectionist, but I don't like us handing this job with the hunters off to someone else. I don't know whether it's a matter of diplomatic neutrality or what, which is what I suspect. It just... My men are trained in non-lethal take-downs. With the skill sets available on board, the numbers, I think it would be relatively simple to render the entire stock of hunters unconscious and have them transported off the planet.

No casualties. Quick. Clean. I've seen other people on board in action, ones I didn't train, both in the simulation room and out in the wild. They're good. The mercenaries could take up protection work after the fact. But honestly, lowest damage possible scenario, I would trust to us.

Yeah. Doesn't sit right. [Not the mission itself. Having the hunters driven out? Fine. Giving up ship expenses and valuables to pay for what they could very easily do themselves? That gives him a lot of pause.]
sidecars: (like syrup bitch)

audio;

[personal profile] sidecars 2016-03-23 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah! Why're we givin' em our stuff when we can do the job for free?
sidecars: (and tips)

[personal profile] sidecars 2016-03-23 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
..... Am I included in any of that grand standing, or?

[ Because Bucky can't really tell. He's clearly not part of the super humans, and Miller has never seen him in actual combat. He's just that one PFC that's kinda in the Army? Yeah. ]

(no subject)

[personal profile] sidecars - 2016-03-23 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] sidecars - 2016-03-23 02:28 (UTC) - Expand
ersatzeverything: (profile)

audio;

[personal profile] ersatzeverything 2016-03-23 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
I've gotta agree. I'd like to find a peaceful solution, but if we're going to do this we should do it ourselves, take responsibility and control how we do it and how far we're willing to go. If we leave it to the mercenaries things could get out of hand.

If we can do it without casualties, I'm totally up for it.

[And if they do decide to do it...]

I could go down to the planet in advance, scope out the place and bring back detailed intel for your team.
ersatzeverything: (flat hat)

[personal profile] ersatzeverything 2016-03-23 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah...uh...info stuff is cool. It's like a hobby.

[His desire to lie and walk back what he'd just admitted wars with a rising professional focus with a possible mission looming.]

Maps and markers. Can do. I can probably get intel on some of the hunters themselves, too. Like, who might have had combat training, who walks around armed and who doesn't, that kind of thing. [Get the right kind of clothes and slip in among them and just gossip for a few hours and see what useful bits of information they might reveal.]

(no subject)

[personal profile] ersatzeverything - 2016-03-23 03:18 (UTC) - Expand
saveyourserpent: (thoughtful)

audio

[personal profile] saveyourserpent 2016-03-23 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
So, essentially, you want people to go down, tranq all the hunters, and send them away before they wake up?

...

Boring, but I suppose it's no less boring than paying a bunch of people in random trinkets.

And when they wake up, head back to where they were, and go right back to what they were doing?

[Because that's what people do after they wake up after being tranqed, right?]
saveyourserpent: (heh)

[personal profile] saveyourserpent 2016-03-23 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
I do suppose they'd be leaving behind plenty of valuables. A whole bloody planet full of them, ripe for the taking. No reason for them to come back with their tails between their legs.

...Wonder what piloting a spaceship's like.

(no subject)

[personal profile] saveyourserpent - 2016-03-23 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] saveyourserpent - 2016-03-23 04:05 (UTC) - Expand
trap_factory: (♊ Malevolent and without form)

[text;]

[personal profile] trap_factory 2016-03-23 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
[Why is he typing a response when a verbal one would be better suited to this, no one knows. But considering cardboard boxes are the de facto stealth item back on Mother Base, this is probably a lot easier to explain]

mentioned this to someone else a week ago... my assigned job is sort of defunct in the face of all these armed and dangerous personnel we have. and i'm not exactly fond of the idea of meddling with the natural order of things either.
[/joke]

though... lowest damage possible scenario sounds like wishful thinking, based on the track record the crew has so far.
trap_factory: (♊ No crucifix can hold it back)

[personal profile] trap_factory 2016-03-23 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
you're the strategizing sort, aren't you?

it doesn't mean it will stand, but it certainly doesn't support the narrative you're trying to spin, does it? it's difficult to ignore the talk of how this crew has apparently left a wake of destruction behind it.

...

you're right! if we're going to destroy the planet by interfering where we're not wanted, then we shouldn't involve outside parties. or, well, any more outside parties than necessary. especially if we're such a reliable group.

(no subject)

[personal profile] trap_factory - 2016-03-23 03:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] trap_factory - 2016-03-23 21:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] trap_factory - 2016-03-26 09:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] trap_factory - 2016-03-29 04:37 (UTC) - Expand
bloodbinds: rollers (Default)

voice;

[personal profile] bloodbinds 2016-03-23 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Whatever you're intending to do, count me in. We don't need to kill these people, but--

[ But what they're doing is murder. Ava wants them gone. ]

I want to help.
bloodbinds: (pic#9524413)

[personal profile] bloodbinds 2016-03-24 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
I hear you on that. We came here and made this our business. It's our responsibility to see it through, and I don't like the idea of some strangers coming in. For all we know, they'll do something worse to this planet and any good intention we might have had will be thrown out the window.

[ She wants to save the creatures that are here, come hell or high water. She can withstand both. ]

I'd just rather not kill if we can help it. It'd be nice if they just leave on their own.

(no subject)

[personal profile] bloodbinds - 2016-03-25 00:26 (UTC) - Expand
diamondslap: (you can't decliiiine)

video

[personal profile] diamondslap 2016-03-23 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
And what, pray tell, will stop them simply going back?
diamondslap: (caviar and cigarettes)

Re: video

[personal profile] diamondslap 2016-03-24 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Mercenaries.

[she says it slowly.]

Mer-cen-aries.

(no subject)

[personal profile] diamondslap - 2016-03-24 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diamondslap - 2016-03-24 23:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diamondslap - 2016-03-28 02:25 (UTC) - Expand
a_shadow: (Suspicious)

text

[personal profile] a_shadow 2016-03-23 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
No casualties? What's the fucking point? They're just going to come back, and I guarantee they'll find a way to buy the mercenaries off to leave them alone once we've turned our backs.

text

[personal profile] a_shadow - 2016-03-23 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

text

[personal profile] a_shadow - 2016-03-23 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

text

[personal profile] a_shadow - 2016-03-23 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

text

[personal profile] a_shadow - 2016-03-23 23:09 (UTC) - Expand
needsnoface: (Default)

Audio

[personal profile] needsnoface 2016-03-24 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
It would be hard to keep any sort of 'neutrality' in the face of the fact there is no way to ensure our involvement in hiring said mercenaries is kept hushed up. I agree with you that if so many are wishing to fight for some moral obligation for a planet that we will likely never see again, then seeing it through personally is actually better.

Though I will state that becoming involved is a risk with a high statistical possibility of causing us more problems in the long run, especially in the event that we are jumping in blind and thus are not seeing factors that could violently cause a change in outcome. Especially in regards to our giving away materials that may or may not be needed for bartering for survival necessities at a future time.

Audio

[personal profile] needsnoface - 2016-03-26 00:11 (UTC) - Expand

Audio

[personal profile] needsnoface - 2016-03-28 22:19 (UTC) - Expand
noitatnacni: (we did blow up the kitchen)

audio

[personal profile] noitatnacni 2016-03-25 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, we could do it anyway. I mean, if you get something organized fast enough, we could have the problem handled before the deal's put into place.

[Hello and welcome to this episode of teenaged superhero logic.]

(no subject)

[personal profile] noitatnacni - 2016-03-26 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] noitatnacni - 2016-03-27 15:52 (UTC) - Expand
gentlemenpreferblondes: (And I mean to care for no one)

audio

[personal profile] gentlemenpreferblondes 2016-03-30 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
But you know, doing things this way also makes it sure that there won't be any casualties on our side.
Edited 2016-03-30 22:56 (UTC)