neveroutwrenched: (pic#9704169)
eyebrowcat ([personal profile] neveroutwrenched) wrote in [community profile] thisavrou2016-03-11 01:40 am

March 9: you know what they say about drinking and texting

i have some questions. for you guys, the crew. us.

mostly about the ingress because i think its bullshit that no one has any idea how to fix it. or how it works. lots of worlds have technology like the ingress. on the greater cosmic scale, in the MULTIVERSE, it's not even all that rare

so

nowait

i mean, anyway. this is a different question. does anyone know why we haven't utilized
a) any of the ingresses (ingress...i?) on any of the planets weve landed on to get home
b) any of the people on those planet because you HAVE to assume someone knows how to work/repair/etcetc

why havent we scrutinized or been given an actual answer for anything that's happened on this ship? creepy skeleton monster? that KILLED PEOPLE. lying to us about caducus-primary. stealing from caducus-primary. dont get me started on the lack of actual consequence to that.

i know its different in everyone's worlds, but where I'm from, being in charge doesnt make you except from responsibility for your actions. or at least it's not supposed to. unless you have

a lot of money or are a celebrity or something
notglitching: (red - step away from the window)

text; encrypted 1/2

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-12 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
Import rate > export rate across known Ingresses.

New arrivals scanned on entry. Functions accounted for, MIDs locked on. Monitoring programs written into source code.

[And wow do they react badly to attempts at scrambling the data.]

System regulations minimal. Exception: derezz. Deleted individuals restored at nearest opportunity, offenders punished.

Conclusion: acquisition and retention of new imports required for administrative goals.
Departure, loss: unacceptable; Ingress functions prioritized to maximize gain.
notglitching: (red - turn and look)

2/2

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-12 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
[.....aaaand, seeing what you did to Miles' secrecy there, Rinzler's just going to append a note.]

Request: retain encryptions on any following replies.

[If it wants to reply at all. But seeing as Rinzler comes from a system where being in charge absolutely makes you above reproach, he'd really rather not be outed for any kind of open trouble-stirring. :c Admins are scary business.]
notglitching: (red - headtilt)

NO WORRIES glad you found it!

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-17 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
[The offscreen nod isn't visible. So Rinzler adds an onscreen one.]

Confirmed.


[Is that unusual?]
notglitching: (red - headtilt)

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-17 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
[...there is so much headtilt.]

Reason?
notglitching: (red - waiting)

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-17 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
[Rinzler shrugs. Everyone's a resource where he's from. And from what little he's seen here, it's not much different.]

Users. Expected.

[Rinzler's really just concerned that no one knows what they're supposed to be used for.]


Demonstrated priority for crew survival.

[So, you know. At least they're valued resources. For now. Until the admins get wherever they're going. That's less depressing, right?]
notglitching: (red - dropping in)

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-18 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
[The comment only gets an offscreen headtilt from the program. As far as he can tell, the admins have a very easy time rerezzing them. Still, resentment isn't anything he has an answer for.

The query, on the other hand, is increasingly familiar.]


Human. Programmer.
notglitching: (red - look back)

[personal profile] notglitching 2016-03-19 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Program.

[Software, not hardware, maybe-user. Get it right. And really? When was this conversation about "everyone on the ship"?]

Local administrators: users.