prorenataa: dnt (getting dressed)
Dr. Adrien Arbuckal ([personal profile] prorenataa) wrote in [community profile] thisavrou2017-04-03 06:32 pm

Video

[ Someone may or may not have already been exploring the asteroid. Hard to tell, as the video appears to be back on Kauto.

This time, rather than picturing the orchard, there is a nice interior shot of his kitchen, along with the crashing of pans. Who the fuck knows. ]


Question to those of you who dabble or "don't dabble" in the clandestine arts. Where do you draw your moral line? Do you have a moral line for short term ... shall we say results and perhaps a separate moral line for the longer projects?

If you potentially had access to a methodology that would extend your prospects of survival in a long term op, but it was seriously sketchy from the moral side of things, would you pursue it?

[ On that note there is a massive crash and the sound of some very inventive cursing, before he continues. ]

Alright, that's it. Civilian life is driving me right over the edge. It's either find someone to fight or the other word that begins with 'eff'. As my requirements for the former are more easily achieved than the latter so let's stick with the former.

Inquire for details within.
modelsixtythree: (light)

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-04 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
If you're still asking the question? Yes.
modelsixtythree: (ready)

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-04 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, I'm usually not the one giving the inspiring speeches. Can I offer some facts instead?
modelsixtythree: (against the wall)

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-05 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
The idea of being willing to do something objectively terrible for a greater good is called utilitarianism. It's a concept that's been around for hundreds if not thousands of years. This is the kind of question people kick around in endless circles.
modelsixtythree: (what now)

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-06 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Doing something objectively terrible for a greater good.
modelsixtythree: (glow)

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-06 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally? I'd say the latter. It's important not to lose sight of your reasons. And just because you're sliding doesn't mean you can't climb, to torture a metaphor.

Or you could just go full-on cackling supervillain, but that generally tends not to work out well.
modelsixtythree: (red behind you)

Encrypted - cw planetary destruction

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-06 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
There is a difference, actually. [She takes a deep breath and lets it out on a sigh before she continues.]

Look, I'm not going to say I know the whole story. But as someone who's spent the last decade or so fighting supervillains, I can say I know a fair amount about that.

What I said about intent before? I mean it. If you were party to destroying a planet because of anger or hatred or jealousy, it might be a different story. Being evil, if you want to call it that, requires a certain amount of selfishness. Your feelings above all else. Somehow I don't think that's your problem.

Sometimes you have to make the hard choices. Kill one to save five. The trolley problem on a grand scale.

I guess the question is if you're looking for absolution or condemnation.
modelsixtythree: (light)

Encrypted - cw planetary destruction

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-06 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, well, in that case. What's the actual downside in trying to do good, regardless of the reason for it? Even if it never evens out in your head, there's still a positive result somewhere.
modelsixtythree: (smileish)

Encrypted - cw planetary destruction

[personal profile] modelsixtythree 2017-04-06 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
[She just laughs quietly, like she can't help it.] Multiverse theory is a whole different issue.

Me, I think there's always a reason to try to make things better. Everyone feels guilty for something. Well. Most people.